The misconception of ecosystem disservices: How a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society
The long-running narrative of
ecosystem services and disservices'' describes how nature yields both benefits and harms to society. These harms include crop pests, floods, landslides, wildfires, and zoonotic disease transmission, among others. While we agree with the argument that calculation of these harms is commonplace and corresponding quantification of benefits is needed, we feel the use of the concept ofecosystem disservices’’ hampers, rather than helps, the development of an integrative and constructive dialogue about conservation and the complex interrelationships between humans and nature.
F. Villa, K. J. Bagstad, B. Voigt, G. W. Johnson, I. N. Athanasiadis, S. Balbi, The misconception of ecosystem disservices: How a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society, Ecosystem Services, 10:52-53, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.003.
You might also enjoy (View all publications)
- Defining and classifying infrastructural contestation: Towards a synergy between anthropology and data science
- Investigation of common big data analytics and decision-making requirements across diverse precision agriculture and livestock farming use cases
- Blockchain applications in the agrifood domain: the first wave