The misconception of ecosystem disservices: How a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society
The long-running narrative of
ecosystem services and disservices'' describes how nature yields both benefits and harms to society. These harms include crop pests, floods, landslides, wildfires, and zoonotic disease transmission, among others. While we agree with the argument that calculation of these harms is commonplace and corresponding quantification of benefits is needed, we feel the use of the concept ofecosystem disservices’’ hampers, rather than helps, the development of an integrative and constructive dialogue about conservation and the complex interrelationships between humans and nature.
F. Villa, K. J. Bagstad, B. Voigt, G. W. Johnson, I. N. Athanasiadis, S. Balbi, The misconception of ecosystem disservices: How a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society, Ecosystem Services, 10:52-53, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.003.
You might also enjoy (View all publications)
- Simulating adaptation strategies to offset potential impacts of climate variability and change on maize yields in Embu County, Kenya
- Reuse of process-based models: automatic transformation into many programming languages and simulation platforms
- Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics. Digital Twins for Sustainability